Nokia Is Microsoft’s Endgame

Lennox is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.

In mid-June, reports from The Wall Street Journal emerged that Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) was in advanced talks to purchase Nokia (NYSE: NOK). Although it later came out that the reported talks fell through, the prospect of a similar deal still lingers. If you take a closer look at the intricacies surrounding the flowery Nokia-Microsoft partnership, you will realize that things are not as you would have imagined.

Nokia had this to say in its 2012 20-F report released earlier in the year:

The agreements with Microsoft may include terms that prove unfavorable to us, or Microsoft could provide better support to another device manufacturer which produces devices that run on the Windows Phone platform.

Since the publication of the report, the terms of the partnership have not changed. Could Microsoft be using the lack of exclusivity in the partnership as leverage for a wider-reaching ulterior goal? Pay close attention.

Notice Ballmer’s shift to ‘devices and services’?

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer might not be the most popular person among Microsoft shareholders. Nonetheless, he hinted something very indicative recently. In his discussion on Microsoft’s overhaul and reorganization, Ballmer made an emphatic iteration of Microsoft’s renewed stance on devices and services.

Why devices and services? The PC isn’t exactly ‘dying,’ as many love to put it, but a good number of less-technical users, so to speak, are making the inevitable shift to mobile. The IDC notes that PC shipments, yet again, dipped in the April-June timeframe, this time slipping 11%. On the flipside, tablets and smartphones continue to make gains across the globe.

With Microsoft’s reliance on the PC under threat, its new solid position on devices will, for the most part, be directed toward mobile. And with the Nokia partnership in place, things are starting to materialize. But wait, this is not the juice. Have you noticed that despite Microsoft’s strong cash position, it is doing little in its capacity to market Windows Phone? If anything, Nokia is doing all the heavy lifting. Interestingly, this is what Microsoft wants. It wants Nokia to do all the marketing for the Windows Phone and in the process wring dry its already depleted coffers.

Microsoft envisions a cash-strapped sinking Nokia

There is no denying that Nokia is in the thick of financial woes. In a late 2012 move aimed at bringing in short term finance, the handset maker sold and leased back its Finnish headquarters for €170 million ($223.3 million). This is in spite of the fact that it had been operating from the building since 1997. This move also coincided with a controversial 10,000 layoffs. And now, Nokia’s balance sheet has taken yet another stretch after it agreed to sign off to paying €1.7 billion ($2.23 billion) for Siemens stake in the Nokia Siemens Network joint venture.

As preposterous as it sounds, Microsoft actually hopes that Nokia fails to plug the cash drain. It hopes that the only headline in Nokia’s ever-disappointing earnings reports remain “Lumia Phones gaining amid sinking Nokia business.” More still, it hopes that Nokia uses the proceeds from Lumia to further market the flagship model, which of course touts the Windows Phone ecosystem as a unique selling point.

In the most recent quarter, Nokia posted losses of $0.06 per share. In view of this, the Finnish handset maker is cutting 440 jobs to control costs. The only thing that screamed bullish was increased sales for the Nokia Lumia units, which increased 32% to hit 7.4 million units.

Windows Phone potential immeasurable

From a strict tech standpoint, Windows Phone has immense potential. Apart from consolidating its place as third in relation to BlackBerry, it has the ability to grow immeasurably. This is because it appeals to the people who actually determine the success of ecosystems; enterprise and app developers.

Google’s (NASDAQ: GOOG) Android, despite being a runaway success, has come under a lot of scrutiny from both enterprise clients and app developers. BBC reports that Android’s security has been found to be profoundly faulty by research firm BlueBlox. According to the research firm, all Android versions since 2009 have a security bug that exposes device users to extreme threats including eaves dropping, sending junk mail, data manipulation and data theft. Although Google has not commented, BlueBox’s findings remains consistent with a recent Juniper Networks mobile threats report which says that Android attacks are up from 24% in 2010 to 92% in 2013.

Even with the Bring Your Own Device concept, enterprise clients are less likely to encourage Android devices in the work in light of these kinds of security concerns. Such an occurrence could easily have a ripple effect and spill over into the consumer market. This will spotlight Windows Phone as a more secure ecosystem.

Android’s fractured ecosystem also presents a huge disadvantage to app developers. Because of the multiple platforms (Donut, Gingerbread, Ice Cream Sandwich), developers are finding it increasingly hard to maintain support across the board. And worse still, they are forced to work in the shadow of nameless fraudulent developers who look to go viral with suspicious apps that cause havoc rather than solve problems. This problem remains a thorn in the flesh of Android’s app ecosystem. Windows Phone can also capitalize on this mistake.

The fact that Windows Phone is also available on mid-range smartphones makes it a better pick for developers who want to extend their reach - nothing like Apple’s iOS, which is limited to the high end of the market.


The potential for Windows Phone is immeasurable. And as Nokia’s Lumia continues to gain traction, Windows Phone’s impact will be felt more and more.

But why isn’t Microsoft going the extra mile just yet? It’s simple. Let Nokia spend its cash, and when it has little to bargain for, swoop in. Nokia will be defenseless because of its weak cash position and also because Microsoft will leverage the lack of exclusivity in the partnership to push for a deal. And if you take a skewed look at it all, you will realize that this falls in line with Ballmer’s renewed ‘devices and services’ position; especially the devices part.

Nokia is a good short-term buy. Microsoft however remains the better long-term investment.

It's incredible to think just how much of our digital and technological lives are almost entirely shaped and molded by just a handful of companies. Find out "Who Will Win the War Between the 5 Biggest Tech Stocks?" in The Motley Fool's latest free report, which details the knock-down, drag-out battle being waged by the five kings of tech. Click here to keep reading.

Lennox Yieke has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Google. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is this post wrong? Click here. Think you can do better? Join us and write your own!

blog comments powered by Disqus