Darden Restaurants: Struggling With Affordability

Zachary is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.

Last week, Darden Restaurants (NYSE: DRI) issued fourth-quarter earnings that failed to live up to expectations. The company is struggling to remain competitive and has resorted to reduced pricing and promotional offerings to boost traffic. Lower pricing naturally cuts into profit margins, and management does not expect the challenging environment to change anytime soon. 
 
Reduced pricing and narrow profit margins make me concerned about a potential decline in the stock price. Let's take a look at how these issues will affect the company over the next few quarters.
 
A challenging environment for restaurants 
Darden's quarterly report reveals a disturbing trend. The company reported an increase in revenue, but a decline in earnings. This scenario usually means one of two things:
  1. The company is aggressively reinvesting profits for future growth, or
  2. The company is struggling with lower profit margins
Darden clearly has a problem with deteriorating profitability. The company's gross, operating, and net profit margins all showed material declines from last year. Traffic growth at Darden's largest brands (Olive Garden, Red Lobster, and Longhorn Steakhouse) has fallen behind industry growth, as customers have opted for lower-priced menu items offered by competing restaurants.
 
This past quarter, management embraced a major strategy shift. Clarence Otis, Darden's CEO, noted that the company has aggressively reduced pricing on their core menu items, while matching promotions run by competitors. With this new strategy, Darden is striving to become more affordable for middle-class consumers.
 
The new promotional pricing strategy was successful in boosting traffic at the company's core restaurants. But lower prices on core menu items, and additional promotional efforts, should keep Darden's profits constrained.
 
Darden's management team does not expect the environment to change over the next year. Their forecast is for a "slow and uneven recovery in both the overall economy and our industry."
 
Wall Street analysts are also concerned with the company's prospects. Since the company issued its disappointing report, analysts have trimmed estimates for the next two years. As you can see in the chart below (courtesy of Yahoo! Finance), Analysts expect earnings of $3.06 for the coming year and $3.34 for 2015.
 
<img alt="" src="http://g.fool.com/editorial/images/53238/dri-eps-expectations-2013-06-25_large.png" />
<img alt="" />
 
Earnings expectations for this year actually represent a slight decline from the $3.13 per share that the company earned in the fiscal year ending May 31, 2013. Darden's stock is currently trading at 16 times next year's expected earnings. It's hard to justify this premium multiple, given the company's poor outlook.

What's behind the consumer decline? 
Darden fits into the casual dining restaurant group, which is typically priced to be affordable for middle-class consumers. Many investors believe that a decline in the unemployment rate has given consumers more money to spend. But middle class families still manage their budgets tightly as a large portion of the new jobs pay less.
 
Structurally speaking, while employment is picking up, the quality of these new jobs leave much to be desired. According to The New York Times, the majority of new jobs pay lower wages than the jobs that were lost during the financial crisis (see full article here).
 
Consumers are also dealing with inflated energy costs as oil prices remain high. For the average consumer, higher gas prices and utility bills cut into discretionary spending, making it much more difficult for middle class families to find room in their budgets for eating out.
 
Brinker International (NYSE: EAT), which manages the Chili's and Maggiano's brands, has also been active in offering promotions and discounts. The company competes directly with Darden Restaurants and appears to be gaining market share.
 
While Brinker has more growth opportunity than Darden (due to a smaller geographic footprint), the management team recently lowered guidance for this year. Management blamed the decline on lower discretionary income resulting from higher payroll taxes, and higher gas prices. 
 
It's interesting to note that Brinker trades at a lower valuation than Darden, despite the fact that Brinker is still growing earnings by 15% annually, while Darden's growth has essentially flatlined.
 
Yum! Brands (NYSE: YUM) is a notch lower in terms of quality of food, but the company is also struggling to maintain growth levels as consumers cut back on spending.
 
Yum! is particularly vulnerable to a slowdown in China, where the company has been aggressively growing its emerging-market presence. For the last quarter, Chinese same store sales declined 20% -- not exactly a vote of confidence for the company's emerging market expansion. 
 
Part of this decline was due to publicity following a supply issue with bad poultry, but the entire company is still dealing with tighter margins and reduced consumer spending on a global basis. The company's worldwide profit margin declined 14% last quarter and management still expects earnings to decline for 2013.
 
No recovery in sight
 
As consumers continue to deal with a challenging employment environment and higher energy prices, casual restaurant chains will be forced to compete based on price. With lower menu prices and tighter profit margins, earnings will be constrained leading to lower stock prices.
 
For Darden in particular, I would not be surprised to see the stock decline to near $30. At $30 per share, the stock would trade at a multiple of 10 times next year's expected earnings, and would represent a 38% drop from current prices.
 
Don't be enticed by the stock's recent decline. Darden still trades at a premium valuation, considering the diminished profit outlook and the challenges in the restaurant industry.


Zachary Scheidt has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Darden Restaurants. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is this post wrong? Click here. Think you can do better? Join us and write your own!

blog comments powered by Disqus