Investing Carnivore Style
Ryan is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.
In terms of per capita meat consumption the United States ranks second in the world, Americans consume meat at a rate over three times the global average. We are indeed a country that loves our meat.
In America, red meat has long been the most popular variety. But a myriad of health issues have been linked to the consumption of large amounts of red meat, colon cancer and cardiovascular disease to name two. While red meat still comprises the majority of the meat we consume, there has been a noticeable shift towards poultry.
First, a few facts about meat consumption trends in the United States. Annual consumption of pork has remained somewhat stable since the 1970's. The record year for beef consumption in America was 1976. Since then, beef eating on a per capita basis has declined more than 30%. On the other hand, poultry consumption has experienced a pronounced rise. The rates at which we eat both chicken and turkey have more than doubled since 1970 (note this data is accurate as of 2007).
Meet the meat mongers
I've selected three companies as potential investments for the carnivore in each of us. First is Tyson Foods (NYSE: TSN), the second largest meat processing company in the world, behind only JBS S.A. (a Brazilian company). Next up is Hillshire Brands (NYSE: SLE), formerly the Sara Lee Company. Last but not least is Smithfield Foods (NYSE: SFD) the largest pork producer in the world.
Bigger doesn't always mean better
Of these three companies Tyson is the largest in terms of meat production and market cap. After looking over a couple of their annual reports I wasn't that impressed. Here's why.
On a per share basis, Tyson has paid the same amount in dividends (16 cents) every single year since 2000. While its great it pays a dividend, stagnation is not something you want to see. Management finally decided to raise the dividend last November, but the yield is still only 0.8%.
The company has two types of common stock, class A and class B. There are 283 million shares of class A outstanding, controlled by 27,000 holders of record. There are 70 million shares of class B stock outstanding owned by just 9 holders of record. And yet when company issues are put to a shareholder vote, nearly 70% of the voting power belongs to the class B stock.
Normalized net income was ridiculously low in 2009. To be fair that's almost certainly an aberration, considering the following year, Tyson realized normalized net income of $794 million. However normalized net income has declined in each year since.
Furthermore Tyson is dependent on one customer, Wal-Mart , for over 10% of revenue. Wal-Mart comprised 13.8% of Tyson's 2012 sales, up from 13.4% in 2010.
The one thing you should give Tyson credit for is that it has adapted to the shift from red meat to poultry. It has established subsidiaries all over the world, from China to Brazil to Mexico, for the purpose of poultry production.
Hillshire Farm, go meat
In June of 2012, the Sara Lee Company spun off its international tea and coffee operations. Immediately after the spin-off Sara Lee changed its name to Hillshire Brands. The Hillshire Brands Company owns several big name brands including Jimmy Dean sausage and BallPark hot dogs. Amazingly, Hillshire Farms is even more dependent on Wal-Mart than Tyson, Wal-Mart accounted for approximately 25% of sales in 2012.
Hillshire reported that its pension plan was underfunded by $165 million as of 2012, compared with $118 million in 2011. Not at all a serious problem yet, but shareholders would be wise to keep an eye on it to make sure it doesn't spiral out of control.
Normalized net income for the past four quarters combined is a negative $17 million. Equity has nearly doubled, mostly by way of reductions in accounts receivable, but at $422 million it's still only roughly one-tenth of the market cap of Hillshire. Those looking for positives will note that Hillshire has the highest margins, both gross and net profit, out of any of the three companies mentioned.
China wants this pork producer
Smithfield Foods recently agreed to be acquired by Shanghui International, the largest meat producer in China. Under the terms of the deal, Smithfield shareholders will receive $34 per share, representing a slight premium to the current market price of $32.75. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of this year.
But some shareholders seem to think they are being low-balled by only being paid $34 each for their shares in the company. They argue the company would be worth well over $34 a share if it split itself up into three divisions.
Personally I think that given Smithfield's recent performance, shareholders are getting a pretty good deal. Year over year net income for Smithfield declined nearly 30% in 2012, and by almost 50% in 2013. If federal regulators give the green light, the deal is almost certain to go through.
Foolish final take
We are a nation that loves meat, and I don't see that changing during the next 100 years. So its understandable how one might conclude that buying stock in one of the top American meat producers is a wise decision.
But in terms of almost any measure of profitability, performance from three of our top producers of meat has been less than stellar of late. Normalized net income data from the latest year available (2012 for Tyson and Hillshire, 2013 for Smithfield) shows that each company registered a much lower number than it did three years ago.
On top of that, none of these three companies pay a decent dividend--Hillshire has the highest yield at 1.5%. So I hate to say it carnivores, but now is not an ideal time to be purchasing any of these three meat companies. It would be difficult to justify calling any of them a bargain at current price levels. But please, do your own research and see if you agree.
The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for this year. Find out which stock it is in the special free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.
Fool blogger Ryan Palmer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is this post wrong? Click here. Think you can do better? Join us and write your own!