A Mixed Outlook for This Growth Stock
Lee is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.
V.F. Corp (NYSE: VFC) presents a familiar investing conundrum for which I don’t have a definitive answer. The said problem is whether to buy a stock if you like its long term prospects but think it is facing near term risks. In summary, the company has some great brands that are benefiting from favorable trends in clothing fashion, but there are short term concerns with some of its end markets, and given the evaluation it’s hard to argue that there is a margin of safety for any disappointments in 2013.
V.F. Corp: A Company You Know but Don’t Know
In order to accelerate learning I will link to a previous article on V.F. Corp. Its most famous brands are The North Face, Timberland and Vans, all of which operate within the Outdoor & Action Sports segment. Its second largest segment is Jeanswear, which contains some iconic brands like Wrangler and Lee.
A breakdown of yearly profits is below. In terms of geography North America makes up 63% of sales, Europe 22% and Asia 8% and 7% for the RoW.
It was a mixed bag of performances in the largest segment. The North Face saw 11% constant currency growth in Q4. This is a good result considering that this year saw another mild winter. I suspect VFC learned a lot from last year, and it seems that it is not going to have the same inventory overhang issues as it did then.
However, it was a different story at Timberland. The warm weather has certainly had an effect with Timberland, but I think the real key to its weak performance (revenues down 4% in the quarter) was more to do with its legacy strength in some weak Southern European markets. Europe is Timberland’s largest sales center, and Southern Europe is its largest market within the region. The guidance is for mid-single digit declines in Europe for Timberland, and this could prove problematic as VFC is integrating Timberland into its European operations this year.
The last of the major outdoor/sports brands is Vans, and it can seemingly do no wrong. Vans achieved 22% constant currency growth and a superb 60% growth rate in Europe alone for Q4. I think the divergence between the performance of Vans and Timberland in Europe is not only a consequence of the weather, but also due to the existing penetration rates. Vans simply has more room to grow, and its brand appeals to a demographic in tune with e-commerce.
What all three have in common is that VFC is expanding its direct-to-consumer (DTC) and online sales. It’s a good way to try ad sales in a difficult marketplace. In fact, DTC revenues now make up 21% of revenues with the number forecast to rise to 23% next year.
It was a mixed story with Jeanswear too. Revenues were only up 4% in constant currency for Q4, but profits rose 53% in the quarter and over 13% in the year. Much of this is due to relatively cheaper cotton prices, and investors should be wary of expecting the same improvements this year.
A good way to think about this is to compare VFC’s Jeanswear division with Jones Group (NYSE: JNY). The latter’s gross margins are materially moved around by cotton prices, and we can see the inverse relationship in the following chart.
The underlying picture was mixed in the quarter with Wrangler revenues up 5% but Lee flat. The latter is facing pricing and top-line pressures from its distribution channels in North America (many of which are troubled mid-market dept stores), while in Asia the moderation in growth has produced an inventory build-up.
As recently as September VFC was talking about a 5-year CAGR of 17% for overall Asian sales, but I note it is forecasting low-teens growth for 2013. I’ve discussed the issues at Lee; The North Face, however, has some challenging targets to hit in 2013. Management expects global North Face revenues to grow at high single digits in 2013 but in the mid-teens for international with 30% growth penciled in from Asia. It’s hard for me to question a management as gifted as VFC has, but opening 200 stores and achieving the larger part of that 30% growth in China (which has seen growth moderate) seems a big ask.
Companies like Yum! Brands have been reporting weaker growth in China, and their share prices have suffered as a consequence. Yum’s problems are not just about the chicken scare, its same store sales growth has been slowing for some time, and the company has made China the focal point of its growth drive.
Things to Look Out for in 2013
While the Chinese growth plans are something to ponder in 2013, the Asian region still only makes up 8% of current sales. In other words, it might not matter that much if they miss. Europe’s difficulties are more important, and it’s here that the downside surprise could occur. The clement weather of the 2012/13 winter has caused some operational issues at The North Face and Timberland, but I would argue that this is largely in the price right now. If you buy the stock now you are more worried about what next winter will bring.
Adjusted EPS is forecast to rise 11% in 2013 to hit $10.7 with revenues up 6%. The margin story is better too with gross and operating margins forecast to grow 100bp. All of which leads into free cash flow of around $1.1 billion. That’s not bad for a company on an enterprise value of $18.7 billion and a share price of $158; if it seamlessly hits its guidance I think it could trade closer to $180. Moreover, this company does have a tradition of exceeding internal guidance.
My caveat here is that I’m sure its share price will go lower if it comes out and says something like ‘the mild winter plus Europe caused greater than expected pricing pressure in the first half but we are maintaining our full year guidance.’ Then I would be a buyer because at this price it looks close to fair value for the risk.
SaintGermain has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is this post wrong? Click here. Think you can do better? Join us and write your own!