This Company Looks Good for Value Investors, But Are There Drawbacks?

Mike is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.

Investors who wish to shift gears and look at an opportunity that has little or nothing to offer in the way of arbitrage may be interested in South Korean steel-making giant POSCO (NYSE: PKX). Despite being one of the largest steel concerns in the world, POSCO routinely gets sidelined in favor of competitors like ArcelorMittal (NYSE: MT) or even United States Steel (NYSE: X)

Although there may be some merit to the argument against POSCO's viability as a long-term investment, it is also true that the firm's shares have been punished for no apparent reason. Its low book value suggests that it has room to run in a shaky environment for basic commodities like iron ore and coal. What's more, its diversification into the liquid natural gas business provides it with some insulation from volatile iron and coal prices. Investors who wish to take a closer look at POSCO may start by comparing it to two of its closest competitors.

POSCO and its competitors

Although there are plenty of independent steel-makers in the world, POSCO is regarded as especially similar to ArcelorMittal and U.S. Steel. Whereas ArcelorMittal is a massive and growing conglomerate with operations and clients in virtually every stable country in the world, U.S. Steel is a legacy company that has suffered through repeated downsizing and adjustments over the past several decades.

Oddly, this discrepancy does not necessarily show in these three firms' market capitalization figures. POSCO's $22.5 billion market cap exceeds ArcelorMittal's $22 billion. Then again, both numbers dwarf U.S. Steel's market cap of just over $2.5 billion. Meanwhile, POSCO earned a decent 2012 profit of $2.2 billion on sales of over $57 billion. ArcelorMittal managed a narrow loss of around $4 billion on revenue of more than $81 billion. U.S. Steel was profitable by the slimmest of margins; its $22 million take came on revenue of nearly $19 billion.

As is par for the course in this capital-intensive industry, all three of these companies have significant, but not overly burdensome debt loads. Whereas POSCO has about $22.5 billion in debt to around $6 billion in cash, ArcelorMittal has obligations valued at $26 billion and a cash hoard of about $8 billion. With $4 billion in debt to $733 million in cash, U.S. Steel's proportional burden is similar.

Valuation and other notes

Value investors who look closely at POSCO should be immediately struck by the company's low price-to-book ratio. At 0.63, it is even lower than the seemingly troubled U.S. Steel's 0.77 figure. Interestingly, ArcelorMittal's reading of 0.45 seems to make the Luxembourg-based firm an even better deal than its Korean rival. Then again, POSCO's forward P/E of 7.5 is almost laughably low, and it compares favorably to respective readings of 9.2 and 11 for ArcelorMittal and U.S. Steel. 

For whatever reason, few mainstream market participants seem to want to own this company. If any reason for this is to be found on the company's balance sheet, it is likely to be contained within POSCO's cash flow report. Although it has a seemingly strong operating cash flow of $6.6 billion, its levered free cash flow is around minus $640 million. In comparison, U.S. Steel has positive levered free cash flow to the tune of $93 million. With free cash flow of nearly $4 billion, ArcelorMittal is definitely in the best shape in this department. This discrepancy may be part of the reason that bloggers and market-watchers seem to favor ArcelorMittal.

An overlooked division?

POSCO does have an advantage that its competitors lack: It has a small but growing presence in the LNG business. While it might seem like an afterthought relative to its core steel and coking businesses, this division could prove to be important in the years to come. Since many industry observers expect natural gas to become more widely available on a global basis, POSCO's international footprint could enable it to become a major supplier of the power source. If the price of natural gas remains low relative to that of conventional oil, this could be a huge boon for the business as a whole.

Perfect investment in a shaky commodity environment?

It is no secret that the commodities market has been in rough waters for the past few years. The price of copper has traded sideways for some time, and even "safe haven" metals like gold and silver have been creamed of late. The market for iron ore is no different: Despite worldwide closings of unprofitable mines and a general tightening of global supply, prices of the metal remain depressed. Given that the global economic recovery remains uneven at best, it is likely that this arrangement will continue in the foreseeable future.

While this environment might be unfavorable for mining companies, it could be a boon for firms like POSCO. With low raw material costs, the company is limited only by demand from its clients and the limits of its own production capacity. As long as China avoids a worst-case "hard-landing" scenario, POSCO's mills should have no problem filling orders. On the other hand, a sudden spike in raw material costs due to increasing global demand or sharply tightening supply could justify POSCO's seemingly unwarranted valuation. However, POSCO's enviable safety margin ensures that such a spike would hit other producers even harder.

In sum, POSCO represents an excellent value play for investors who wish to gain exposure to the steel-making space. Although many observers favor the similarly undervalued ArcelorMittal, others have openly talked about the potential for POSCO's market capitalization to double or even triple. With generally solid fundamentals and a diversified base of operations, POSCO could be an irresistible pick for value investors.

With the U.S. relying on the rest of the world for such a large percentage of our goods, many investors are ready for the end of the "made in China" era. Well, it may be here. Read all about the biggest industry disrupters since the personal computer in 3 Stocks to Own for the New Industrial Revolution. Just click here to learn more.


Mike Thiessen has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of ArcelorMittal. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is this post wrong? Click here. Think you can do better? Join us and write your own!

blog comments powered by Disqus