Can the Current Transition Save Zynga's Farm?

Adrian is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.

The past month has been terrible for Zynga's (NASDAQ: ZNGA) stock performance: a -21.45% negative return so far. Why is this happening? Is negative momentum going to improve in the next weeks, or is Zynga's stock price bound to continue decreasing?

Well, in order to find some answers let us start this analysis by remembering why this happened. It all started at the beginning of this month, when Zynga fired 18% of its staff (520 people) and shuttered its New York, Dallas and Los Angeles offices. It went as far as closing the OMGPOP Studio (which developed the Draw Something game series) only 1 year after acquiring it for $200 million. The reason for all these sudden changes? According to Mark Pinucs, it's all about "transition." Zynga is to become a very different company, with a stronger focus on mobile, much less Facebook dependence and real money gambling sites (currently available in the U.K., and if legalization happens, probably also in the U.S. someday). But there are transitions and transitions. What kind is this to be?

<img alt="" src="http://media.ycharts.com/charts/a4f0383ffc7ab292474d53a93d910cd5.png" />

Zynga's main issue

It is not the absence of cash (as Zynga is said to have $1.6 billion in cash and cash equivalents), but the absence of revenue growth. Zynga's revenue is decreasing at high speed and so far it is not showing any signals of slowing down.

<img alt="" src="http://g.fool.com/editorial/images/52566/zynga-revenue-q1-2013_large.jpg" />

Revenue is decreasing because Zynga's average revenue per daily active user (ARPDAU) is decreasing. This is both because an active user spends less money than before and because there are less active users. While MAU in Q4 2014 was 298 million, in Q1 2013 it was 253 million, showing that Zynga lost 16% of its MAU in a single quarter.

<img alt="" src="http://g.fool.com/editorial/images/52566/zynga-2013-earnings-users-1_large.jpg" />

Furthermore, the second quarter may be even worst than the 16% MAU decrease in the first quarter. According to Pincus (latest earnings call, April 24):

"2013 remains a transition year and we continue to expect uneven, non-linear results. To that end, we’re expecting a significant decline in our Q2 bookings".

Zynga's problem of keeping its user base growing and its users engaged is not new. For example, in an excellent 2011 valuation paper by Forro, Cauwels and Sornette, the instability of some of the most emblematic of Zynga's games DAU was shown clearly. Zynga games were starting to show a short unstable decreasing cycle. Between July 2009 and April 2010, Zynga's DAU increased thanks to Farmville's increasing popularity. But everything changed after July 2010. With the launch of Cityville in January 2011, Zynga managed to recover some DAU back. But a couple of months later Zynga's DAU continued decreasing. The problem could not be solved with launching more similar games: Facebook dependent, non-mobile social games were losing popularity very fast, while mobile games on other platforms were becoming more and more popular. 2010 was a great time to focus on mobile or launch a real money gambling site. But the company continued producing the same type of games. 2011 was a great time to make a transition. But 2013 may be way too late.

<img alt="" src="http://g.fool.com/editorial/images/52566/zynga0003_large.jpg" />

Now, there are hundreds (if not thousands) of companies and startups all over the world devoted to developing and producing mobile games. There are a dozen companies very good at marketing real money gambling sites that are waiting for legalization of online gambling in the U.S. to happen, so they can join one of the soon-to-be hugest markets in the segment. And the popularity level of Zynga's characters and other intellectual property related to Farmville is not the same as in 2010. A transition under these conditions is certainly going to be difficult and complex. And I'm not sure that massive layoffs are a step towards progress considering that by laying off engineers, designers and other personel you are losing deployment power and inevitably enhancing organizational stress that may be adverse to innovation. It may be better for us investors to watch this transition from the sidelines.

The bottom line

There are no guarantees that Zynga's transition will be succesful. We showed that the transition may be too late and that now fierce competition in the mobile gaming & online gambling sector are difficult challenges to overcome with less people working for Zynga. The upside is that this may the gaming stock with the lowest expectations on the Street. Allow me to explain this by comparing Zynga's stock with Electronic Arts (NASDAQ: EA) and Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ: ATVI).

<img alt="" src="http://media.ycharts.com/charts/06fb98573c0d33a24d8c22018397932a.png" />

Compared with EA and Activision Blizzard, Zynga's stock performance has obviously been the worst. At $2.70 per share, investors can't be more clear. Few believe that Zynga wil be successful in its transition and those who are long may be well aware of the risks their position involve and yet are long simply because the stock is "too cheap:" Zynga has $1.6 billion in cash, and considering that the current market capitaliztion is $2.15 billion, Zynga is actually worth less than $600 million.

Unlike Zynga, EA may be at its best moment in the past 52 weeks. But expectations are so high that a correction is a strong possibility, since EA surprised investors by giving stronger 2014 guidance. Considering the poor history of forecasting earnings of EA and the fact that there is a major console transition going around, EA may have problems reaching its own estimate. If EA does not beat the Street, a major correction in stock price is set to occur. Again, unlike Zynga, there is plenty of room for price decreases here.

How about Activision Blizzard? While the current upward momentum is not as strong as at EA, Activision Blizzard's stock is 27% up in the past 6 months. But the company's main cash cow, the highly addictive World of Warcraft, may be having problems with keeping its current base of subscribers high, as the figure has dropped from 9.6 million to 8.3 million, as it was reported in the March quarter. This story looks similar to Farmville in 2010. Activision Blizzard is trying to produce another hit to replace the World of Warcraft franchise, but it seems that a release will not occur any time soon. Under these conditions, Activision's current stock price may not reflect the risks to which its main cash cow is exposed to in the middle run, and a correction could also be expected here. 

Now, few people have high expectations on Zynga and it is a well-known fact that the company's revenue and user base are decreasing. Because of this, I do not see downward momentum improving all of the sudden, but the stock could be dead money for quite a while, at least until Zynga shows clear signals that its transition will be either successful or a disaster. 

Zynga's post-IPO performance has been dreadful, and investors are beginning to wonder if it's "game over" for this newly public company. Being so closely tied to the world's largest social network can be a blessing and a curse. You can learn everything you need to know about Zynga and whether it's a buy or a sell in our new premium research report. Don't even think about picking up shares before you read what our top analysts have to say about Zynga. Click here to access your copy.


Adrian Campos has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Activision Blizzard. The Motley Fool owns shares of Activision Blizzard. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is this post wrong? Click here. Think you can do better? Join us and write your own!

blog comments powered by Disqus