A Big Pharma Company With a Juicy Dividend Yield and Low Valuation

Anh is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.

Recently, AstraZeneca (NYSE: AZN) announced that it has agreed to acquire Pearl Therapeutics, the respiratory drug manufacturer, in a transaction worth around $1.15 billion. Since the beginning of the year, AstraZeneca has gained more than 8%, lagging the S&P 500’s return of more than 14.7%. Is AstraZeneca a good buy after its recent acquisition? Let’s find out.

Synergy between AstraZeneca and Pearl Therapeutics

AstraZeneca is considered a big player in the cardiovascular field, generating more than $9.53 billion, or 34% of total revenue in 2012. It also derived a significant portion of its top line from respiratory & inflammation products to the tune of $4.4 billion, accounting for 14.8% of total sales in 2012. Its iconic brand in Respiratory & inflammation segment is Symbicort, producing nearly $3.2 billion in sales.

The acquisition of the privately-held Pearl Therapeutics would give AstraZeneca exposure to the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is in late-stage development. AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot felt excited about this acquisition. He said: “Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease continues to increase worldwide and there is a growing need for the next generation of inhaled combination products. Pearl’s novel formulation technology, together with its development products and specialist expertise are a great complement to AstraZeneca’s long-established capabilities in respiratory disease, one of our core therapy areas.”

He strongly believes that Pearl Therapeutics would give AstraZeneca various treatment options, strengthening the company’s respiratory portfolio. Interestingly, AstraZeneca only has to pay $560 million on completion, and the remaining $450 million would be paid if certain development milestones are achieved.

AstraZeneca expects a sharp fall in both sales and profit in 2013, but the long-term should be brighter with the ongoing business restructuring under the leadership of new CEO Pascal Soriot. He has decided to suspend share buybacks and dividend increases to reserve cash for acquisitions and in-house R&D, which would boost the company’s long-term prospects. The market values AstraZeneca at only 9.9 times its forward earnings.

The cheapest but paying the highest dividend yield

Compared to its peers GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) and Novartis (NYSE: NVS), AstraZeneca is much cheaper. GlaxoSmithKline is trading at around $52.80 per share with a total market cap of nearly $128 billion. The market values GlaxoSmithKline at a higher valuation at 12.3 times its forward earnings. In the beginning of May, it announced that its product, BREO ELLIPTA, had received FDA approval to treat patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

This product is the result of the collaboration between GlaxoSmithKline and Theravance. According to the company, BREO ELLIPTA supports patients to breathe and minimize the risk of exacerbations. Looking forward, GlaxoSmithKline estimates that it could grow its core EPS by 3%-4% CER (constant exchange rate).

Novartis, at $72.80 per share, is worth more than $178.8 billion on the market. The market values Novartis the most expensively at 13.45 times its forward earnings. Novartis also has been seeking FDA approval for its once-daily COPD products. Several studies have suggested the strength of Novartis’ COPD products, including improving patients’ lung function and less exacerbation.

Tim Wright, the head of development commented: “The expanding Novartis COPD portfolio brings us another step closer to meeting the unmet needs of millions of patients worldwide.” For the full year 2013, Novartis expects that its net revenue would be in line with 2012 CER, even after including $3.5 billion from generic competition. Its CER core operating income was estimated to decline in mid-single digits in 2013.

AstraZeneca pays investors the juiciest dividend yield of as high has 7.5%. GlaxoSmithKline ranks second with 4.2% dividend yield, while the dividend yield of Novartis is around 3.5%.

My Foolish take

AstraZeneca, under new leadership, should deliver decent operating results after its business restructure. With the juiciest dividend yield and the relatively lowest valuation, AstraZeneca seems to be a decent buy for long-term investors.

What's inside Supernova?
If you're an investor looking for big long term winners, Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner's picks have frequently trounced the market. How? Because he's always on the lookout for revolutionary stocks and recommends them before Wall Street catches on to their disruptive potential. If you're interested in how David discovers his winners, click here to get instant access to a personal tour behind David's Supernova service.



Anh HOANG has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is this post wrong? Click here. Think you can do better? Join us and write your own!

blog comments powered by Disqus

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure