Samsung Is a Sell, Sell, Sell
Alexander is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.
In most instances, a patent can be a barrier of entry into a marketplace, but fortunately neither company is low on financial resources and even if one company were to lose one patent case the other company could easily make up for it with a patent win of their own.
Apple wins a round
AllThingsD reports that Apple won a patent case in Japan:
The Tokyo District Court ruled Friday that a handful of Samsung smartphones violate Apple’s “rubber-banding” patent. That patent describes, among other things, the over-scroll bounce iOS performs when it reaches the bottom of a scrollable element, and it’s proving a powerful weapon in Apple’s intellectual property arsenal. The company successfully asserted it against Samsung in its $1.05 billion U.S. lawsuit against the company last summer.
Now, neither Apple nor Samsung actually needs the money. Both companies generate significant profits from smartphone devices. The patent battle that’s going on is just a distraction that takes away from the bigger picture of investing in these companies. The smartphone and tablet market are projected to grow at really fast rates, and in most instances a patent grants the company the ability to earn revenue from licenses. In most instances, it doesn’t mean that one company will not be able to use the other company's patented technology idea.
For both Apple and Samsung this will be an added cost to selling the product, but both companies are likely to offset the cost of paying out royalties with the royalties they collect from each other. Smartphone devices at the higher-end have higher gross margins, and because of this both Samsung and Apple can afford to pay royalty fees on the higher end phones.
Low-end smartphones will not borrow technologies from other patent portfolios because of the added licensing costs. So at the high-end you will find smartphone devices that are somewhat homogeneous and have similar features. But at the low-end, Samsung will never release features from an Apple iPhone on lower-margin devices due to the added cost of licensing.
Samsung wins a round
Apple has lost a patent case, according to RT:
The US key trade regulator – the International Trade Commission (ITC) – agreed Apple violated a patent of South Korean rival Samsung. The ITC decided that usage of 3G mobile data links by Apple in its iPhone 4 and 3-G capable iPad 2 infringed Samsung patent rights.
Going forward, I find the negative effects from these patent disputes to be minimal as Apple will most likely license Qualcomm 4G LTE antennae technologies (currently Qualcomm is estimated to have 97% market share). Qualcomm has the most advanced wireless technology patents in the world. Qualcomm sells its technological wisdom to both Samsung and Apple. So in this upcoming phone generation, it is unlikely that Samsung can succeed at getting a ban under the guise of 4G as neither Apple nor Samsung owns the 4G technology that goes inside of their phones.
The business environment
Samsung’s stock has declined by 11.4% since the beginning of June. I believe the company is facing fundamental problems in the high-end smartphone space. Apple makes the lion's share of total global profit in smart phones, making it the superior company.
Apple earned 57% of global profit share in the smartphone market while holding 18% market share. Comparatively Samsung had 30.8% market share and earned $2 billion less than Apple in the first quarter.
Samsung was able to make gains in market share through lower-priced phones in emerging market economies like China and India. Apple will be selling different phone versions by the end of 2013 in order to generate greater market share and to decrease the competitiveness of Samsung in low-income markets. I believe that Apple will keep its comparative advantage in profitability and increase its market share by 2014.
Windows 8 the next big thing
Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) will continue to grow due to Windows 8 purchases. Currently Nokia has 14% of global market share in the phone space, and going forward almost every Nokia will be shipped using a Windows 8 mobile operating system. The third alternative in the mobile space will be the Windows Phone because Microsoft’s operating system is very familiar to the average user and has a lot of spunk; Windows 8 software runs buttery smooth, unlike Google Android.
The greatest advantage of Nokia partnering with Microsoft is that it gives Nokia access to Microsoft’s expansive ecosystem of applications. Plus I don’t anticipate Office 365 to go over to Android anytime soon.
I believe that Microsoft could generate an additional $10 billion a year from Office 365, just by launching it on both Windows 8 and Mac/IOS. Going forward students and employees will either buy an Apple or Windows device just because of Office 365.
The cross-compatibility of work, play, and user experiences definitely favor Apple and Microsoft. This more or less throws Samsung, LG, and Motorola under the bus.
I believe that Samsung could have difficulty in the near future. While it has compelling products, its ecosystem (Android) isn’t nearly as strong as Microsoft’s or Apple’s. This could be the beginning of the end for Samsung’s reigning dominance in global market share.
It's incredible to think just how much of our digital and technological lives are almost entirely shaped and molded by just a handful of companies. Find out "Who Will Win the War Between the 5 Biggest Tech Stocks?" in The Motley Fool's latest free report, which details the knock-down, drag-out battle being waged by the five kings of tech. Click here to keep reading.
Alexander Cho has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is this post wrong? Click here. Think you can do better? Join us and write your own!