Looking for the Next Berkshire Hathaway

Andrés is a member of The Motley Fool Blog Network -- entries represent the personal opinion of the blogger and are not formally edited.

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B) has delivered truly amazing returns for investors who were smart enough to invest with Buffett and Munger for the long term. However, the company has gotten quite big, and this materially reduces the chances of outsized performance in the future.

But other smaller companies are trying to imitate Berkshire´s success, and the hunt for the next Berkshire Hathaway, meaning a smaller company with a similar strategy and higher growth potential, could be a lucrative venture for investors.

Size Matters

Berkshire is a collection of many of the best businesses in the world as selected by Warren Buffett himself. This means that the company will most likely deliver solid performance from a risk and return perspective for years to come.

But, due to its size, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for the company to beat the indexes by a wide margin. Buffett has been quite explicit on the fact that investors shouldn't expect from Berkshire the same kind of outperformance it delivered it the past. In his own words:

"If I was running $1 million today, or $10 million for that matter, I'd be fully invested. Anyone who says that size does not hurt investment performance is selling. The highest rates of return I've ever achieved were in the 1950s. I killed the Dow. You ought to see the numbers. But I was investing peanuts then. It's a huge structural advantage not to have a lot of money. I think I could make you 50% a year on $1 million. No, I know I could. I guarantee that."

Berkshire is now one of the biggest corporations in the world, so it can hardly replicate the kind of stratospheric returns Buffett produced when he was managing smaller sums of money. Quality is out of the question, so there is a good chance that Berkshire will beat the indexes in the long term, but not for a wide margin.

Leucadia National

Leucadia (NYSE: LUK) is an investment holding company with interests in areas like mining, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, banking, insurance, winery and real estate among others. Last year the company acquired the remaining 70% of global investment bank Jefferies Group it didn't already own, and Jefferies now represents nearly 45% of the company's book value.

Leucadia is often referred as “mini Berkshire” because the company founded in the late 1970s by renowned investors Ian Cumming and Joseph Steinberg, has grown through acquisitions from a small financial services firm to a diversified holding with more than $10 billion in market value. Leucadia and Berkshire are also partners in Berkadia Commercial Mortgage company.

However, Leucadia has traditionally followed a riskier investment strategy than Berkshire; the company suffered serious losses during the financial crisis and its stock price never recovered to pre-crisis levels. Besides, the founders are handing off the reins to Rich Handler and Brian Friedman, who were the CEO and president at Jefferies respectively. With Jefferies becoming a big part of Leucadia and the change in top level management, Leucadia is becoming too concentrated and risky to be considered the next Berkshire Hathaway. 


Loews (NYSE: L) owns 90% of property and casualty insurer CNA Financial, which represents nearly 50% of the company´s revenues. Just like Berkshire, Loews uses the float from the insurance business to invest in other sectors.

The company has made successful investments in the energy sector with names like Diamond Offshore  and Boardwalk Pipeline, and management - Loews has been managed by members of the Tisch family since 1961- has a solid track record when it comes to allocating capital.

On the other hand, CNA´s underwriting business has historically produced subpar returns. That´s a big difference in comparison with Berkshire and its top notch insurance operations.


Markel (NYSE: MKL) is usually referred to as “baby-Berkshire,” and for good reasons. The company´s president and CIO, Tom Gayner, working together with Chairman and CEO Alan Kirshner, has produced outstanding returns for investors over the long term: Markel has multiplied its price more than 20 times since 1990.

Markel is focused on specialized insurance, and this allows the company to differentiate itself from the competition and obtain solid results from its underwriting operations. Like Berkshire, Markel capitalizes its financial strength by investing a relatively high proportion of its assets in high quality stocks with strong competitive advantages to maximize returns.

Markel has recently acquired  reinsurance company Alterra for $3.1 billion. Alterra could play for Markel a similar role to the one General Reinsurance plays for Berkshire, diversifying risks and allowing for more flexibility in the investment portfolio.

Bottom Line

Due to its profitability in both underwriting and investments, its amazing track record of long term returns, and business model similarities , Markel looks like the strongest candidate to become the next Berkshire Hathaway.

The price of becoming the world's greatest investor is that Warren Buffett can no longer make many of types of investments that made him rich in the first place. Find out about one such opportunity in "The Stock Buffett Wishes He Could Buy." The free report details a sector of the economy Buffett's heavily invested in right now and exactly why he can't buy one attractive company in that sector. Click here to keep reading. 

Andrés Cardenal owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool recommends Berkshire Hathaway, Loews, and Markel. The Motley Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Loews, and Markel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is this post wrong? Click here. Think you can do better? Join us and write your own!

blog comments powered by Disqus